More than one religion or worldview in a single country to accommodate, has always been a problem.

praag.co.za is current, active, african! Daily picture of South African news and International events in Afrikaans English News African News Southern Africa International News Business Opinion Letters Editorials Columnists Andre Alkema Anton Barnard Buks van Rensburg Christo Landman Dan Roodt Danie Goosen Dirk Uys Gerhard Lourens Gideon Meiring Gustav Venter Hein Zaayman monte design Hannes Engelbrecht Heinrich Matthee Appel Jaap Steyn Jared Taylor Jeanette Koekemoer works everywhere JH du Toit, Johan Combrink Johann Theron Johann Wingard Joseph Secreve Karin Roodt Koos Malan LI Bertijn Leon Lemmer Louise Mabille Magnus Heystek Manfred Delport honourd Davel Joubert Meshack Mabogoane Piet Kotze Pieter Oosthuizen Skoppens Farmer Sonette Ahlers monte design Socrates the Act Susan Combrink Thys Human Vlad du Plessis Sports General Athletics Golf Rugby Cricket Soccer Swimming Tennis Video serial General Stories BOTTOM Gustav Venter Poems History Living Food & Fashion Beauty Shopping | Home & Travel Business Travel Getaway monte design Cars Car News Motorsport road tests Technology Personal Business Technology Space Science Entertainment Books Movies TV Music Arts Architecture Design Art Photography homeland homeland homeland Council News Media Reports Sign up! Sign up! Who are we? Contact Forum Newsletter
More than one religion or worldview in a single country to accommodate, has always been a problem. Our ancestors with French surnames have landed in the Cape because of the Bartolomeusnag when Catherine de Medici decided the gates of Paris and close to all Protestants for the foot to kill. Until the early 1700s there were religious wars and a certain Marie Durand (a name that actually Afrikaans sounds!) In the south of France for 38 years in a dungeon imprisoned because she refused to her Protestant faith distance to do.
Hence the decision to European church and state separate. Unfortunately we currently see how the secular European monte design state is no longer able to maintain this separation because Muslim immigrants an absolute view of their own faith and thus maintain expects schools especially must adjust and they should allow their applications maintain.
In our country monte design prevails on the one hand a value crisis because we are not able to distinguish between right and wrong to discern, and the other is a kind of appeal to secularism monte design of European type done, but without actually history and veronderstelllings of these.
The post-1994 government is hardly ideologically neutral. Croucamp's specific attack on the Christian religion is from a chauvinistic prejudice against Christians. He would not, for example the same hurtful remarks about Islam or Judaism does not.
Or even Mandela's name in vain. I happen to have a week or ten days ago, an email received from someone at his work to be dismissed monte design because he refused to participate in the corporate Mandela participate! He was suspended and a disciplinary hearing because his refusal apparently the company in a bad light and also offensive to black employees gave.
"You would see many intellectual or academic monte design objections to Croucamp's" argument "could bring. Indeed, like the existence or not of God philosophers and theologians for centuries busy. Science itself is by no means absolute (although gravity and a few other things difficult monte design can be disproved) and Croucamp's appeal to Einstein as the antithesis of Christian thought at the very least problematic, since modern quantum physics, including the theory of the Big Bang partaking of certain assumptions which are essentially not much of difference monte design eg Genesis. But I do not think that's what it's about.
Croucamp is completely free to Christians to curse and scold - although, one would like to see it for the sake of consistency it to the other Semitic religions spread, if he has the courage disposal - but in his personal capacity. The argument against the existence of African universities, namely that the taxpayer no language other than English may not subisidieer, certainly applies to the proclamation of idiosyncratic personal biases while dealing with a subsidized monte design official? Croucamp likewise not his comments about a brain dead God and Christ in a cafe Melvillese made, but apparently monte design on the premises of the University of Johannesburg (RAU who once was). Unless the style of academic debate is so deteriorated and now no longer the average pub conversation distinction was made, I think that Croucamp not the form and rules of an academic or intellectual conversation comply.
The Constitution does not protect monte design believers from criticism of their religion just like that atheists are not protected from criticism. Then we have to